posted
11/16/09 12:34 PM
|
updated
11/16/09 06:39 PM
Featured Post! |
Views:
290
|
Comments :
3
|
News, etc.
Seward Site Council geographic zone vote: It's a tie
By
cdmilton
|
TOPS @ Seward
|
|
|
So, it's been what...10 years now? And still TOPS doesn't want to work with the neighborhood? Maybe it's more complex than that, but that's how it's come out. Every time I drive past the CITY tennis courts and the CITY playground and see the school kids swamping them...and realize that the school wants to use neighborhood city facilities every day but doesn't want to recognize neighborhood kids, I get extremely annoyed. I've heard it's a great school, but I'd rather have a program there that has some perspective on its place in the city infrastructure. |
|
|
Comment by
Annoyed
8 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
TOPS@Seward
|
|
| And when SPS stops busing kids to TOPS in a few years and instead all the current students have to drive or carpool into the area, that should really have no effect at all on local traffic or parking for residents or businesses in the area. Oh, I forgot. You don't live in the area so you couldn't care less, except when you can't find a spot to park for a school event? Right. Maybe you'll find a spot in front of a house of somebody who's had to drive their kid over to Montlake or wherever the District has now assigned our kids. | |
|
Comment by
Annoyed
8 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
|
TOPS Site Council Vote
|
|
|
Dear Annoyed and others checking this site. Admittedly it's been a long slog with the District and the TOPS community to keep families in Eastlake long-term via predictable access to the school at the heart of our community. I know that many are concerned that our (4-year-old) 20 percent of kindergarten class seat placement promise is disappearing as SPS rolls out its new student assignment plan for the coming year. It's true. It's going away. But there are a couple of bright spots, and there are ways to weigh in on the current state of the state constructively. 1) The geographic zone tiebreaker around TOPS will be proposed as early as mid-Dec. Everyone who has followed this issue in the neighborhood is hoping the bulk of Eastlake is included in the zone. That would mean the 4-7 kindergarteners coming out of the neighborhood each year would have an extremely good shot at attending TOPS. (This is about the same amount of neighborhood enrollment as we have had with the 20 percent agreement.) If you want to tell the District that you want neighborhood placement for TOPS, the time to comment is right now. Contact the District via this link: http://www.seattleschools.org/area/newassign/faq_tiebreakers 2) Despite the fact that TOPS chose not to support a joint proposal with Eastlake to the District, there appear to be more school families supportive of Eastlake's viewpoint than a few years back. Discussion with the TOPS Site Council has been helpful and the tone has been respectful. I don't anticipate the school publicly pushing *against* neighborhood placement, as happened a while back. 3)I have one child at TOPS and one on the way next year. A few families in Eastlake have asked over the past weeks whether TOPS makes neighborhood kids feel unwelcome. In my experience, 98 percent of the population has been very accepting of my family and the others from the neighborhood, and have put politics aside in favor of working toward a great education for the kids. If you have more questions about the TOPS situation, pls. contact me via info@eastlakeseattle.org and either I or one of the other neighbors working on this matter will get back to you. Michelle Buetow |
|
|
Comment by
Yale Ave
8 months ago
|
(
0
votes
)
(
report abuse
)
(
reply
)
|
